The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the record of misleading methods is using a take a look at that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This enables mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) take a look at. The actual fact is, the PCR take a look at just isn’t designed to be used as a diagnostic device because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “stay” or reproductive ones.1
It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses aren’t interchangeable when it comes to infectivity. In case you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can not unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome folks testing “optimistic.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Take a look at Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR take a look at works and the way we’re deciphering outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Because of its tiny measurement, it have to be amplified to turn out to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given take a look at or lab known as a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the better the danger that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the take a look at reads optimistic even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no risk to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Scientific Infectious Illnesses revealed that whenever you run a PCR take a look at at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false optimistic price.
But, a take a look at generally known as the Corman-Drosten paper and checks beneficial by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention suggest working PCR checks at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the take a look at ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of optimistic checks, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many at the moment are questioning whether or not this was completed on goal to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is generally known as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s property.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as general mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and according to earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, individuals are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness just isn’t killing an extra variety of folks. The identical variety of folks would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC information15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only real trigger on the dying certificates.
“For deaths with circumstances or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further circumstances or causes per dying,” the CDC said, and any a type of comorbidities might have killed these folks even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of information at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in gentle of all these information tells us they don’t seem to be taken with getting an correct image of the an infection price.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Illnesses confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR take a look at have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a optimistic PCR take a look at being a true optimistic shrinks to zero.
Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluate17 printed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Illnesses assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which had been printed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values had been considerably decrease … in specimens producing stay virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the prospect of a optimistic take a look at really being because of the presence of stay (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the percentages of stay virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit enhance in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included had been unable to determine any stay viruses in circumstances the place a optimistic PCR take a look at had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, to be able to produce stay virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR take a look at used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, you probably have signs of COVID-19 and take a look at optimistic utilizing a PCR take a look at that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you might be prone to be contaminated and infectious.
Nonetheless, for those who shouldn’t have signs, but take a look at optimistic utilizing a PCR take a look at run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s probably a false optimistic and also you pose no threat to others as you are unlikely to hold any stay virus. The truth is, offered you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even for those who take a look at optimistic with a take a look at run at 24 CTs or larger.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Take a look at
The video above contains a number of interviews with consultants who’ve overtly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections akin to COVID-19. These embody:
The inventor of the PCR take a look at, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the take a look at for different infections, akin to HIV, however died in August 2019, a number of months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Heart for Proof-Primarily based Drugs
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a marketing consultant pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned professional on the PCR take a look at
In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR take a look at to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the take a look at does is amplify molecules into one thing you possibly can detect, but it surely can not inform you whether or not these particles really pose a threat to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you possibly can basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all types, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply useless particles that pose no threat.
Bustin factors out that whenever you get a optimistic outcome utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are wanting on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The probability of that inflicting a well being drawback is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR take a look at with a CT above 35 renders it roughly ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting useless nucelotides. No stay virus could be detected at CTs that top.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Primarily based
November 30, 2020, a workforce of twenty-two worldwide scientists printed a evaluate18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual the world over.
In accordance with Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key wrongdoer within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted resulting from “deadly errors,”24 one in all which is the truth that it was written (and the take a look at itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was accessible. All they used was the genetic sequence printed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was printed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer evaluate. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who at the moment are demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that take a look at has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID take a look at.
When Drosten developed the take a look at, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the take a look at from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like supplying you with a number of bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It might be any fish … Hear, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you set it in … That is principally a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten take a look at paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they had been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There’s nothing on the heart of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they stated: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Are you aware what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. They usually assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all stuffed with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the evaluate reads, partially:26
“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to tremendously reduce human price and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the perfect curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is evident. Within the face of all of the great PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There’s not a lot of a selection left within the framework of scientific integrity and duty.”
The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The examine evaluated information from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Might 14 and June 1, 2020.
A complete of 300 examined optimistic however had no signs. Of the 34,424 folks with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined optimistic a second time. But, once they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined optimistic (both for the first or second time), no stay virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Assessments Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody checks are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. In case you have antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that will be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future prior to now. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 antibody take a look at may additionally end up optimistic you probably have antibodies in opposition to frequent chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses accountable for the frequent chilly can lead to a optimistic COVID-19 antibody take a look at, even for those who’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to supply some basic and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 printed Might 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell degree, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In accordance with the authors, this implies there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, for those who’ve recovered from a typical chilly attributable to a selected coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate whenever you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you immune to COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in essentially the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a adverse antibody take a look at would not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might really be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 printed within the July 1, 2020, difficulty of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a few of the accessible information, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they aren’t.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at varied inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex take a look at and for a hypothetical take a look at that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which probably mirror present circumstances in the USA and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex take a look at.”
Ebell and Barry identified that most of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they beneficial that labs report take a look at outcomes “in a manner that displays the native inhabitants prevalence based mostly on widespread testing and embody the false-positive price,” as this info “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making concerning earlier an infection and return to work or college.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that information of their reporting, and the manner issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that take a look at optimistic for COVID-19 an infection don’t have any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out figuring out it, and which 90% are in a position to get rid of with out remedy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital assets wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting folks to die resulting from lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even lowering the variety of folks that will ultimately get contaminated. They definitely had been by no means meant to stop all dying. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not attainable, underneath any circumstance.
Brief-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings had been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, ultimately, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the perfect type — would stop it from reemerging. But the aim posts maintain shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns become months in some areas. Ultimately, we had been instructed every part would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine grew to become accessible. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we had been instructed we would nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns nicely into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?
The one rational cause for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering based mostly on a mixture of wildly manipulated information and flawed checks.
Except for PCR testing information, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there may be such a factor as COVID-19, and folks have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths resulting from it.36,37,38 The full mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, until we suppose we should always shut down the world and cease dwelling as a result of folks die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is no cause to close down the world as a result of some folks occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR take a look at is “not a dependable take a look at for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single optimistic PCR take a look at can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Due to this fact, “any enforced quarantine based mostly on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome folks to self-isolate might be a violation of their basic proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which can assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, think about:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to impartial consultants — do the analysis. Learn via the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the information on PCR testing, so you possibly can clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- If you’re a medical skilled, particularly for those who’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from impartial consultants.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be a part of a gaggle so that you simply can have help — Examples of teams shaped to battle in opposition to authorities overreach embody Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening colleges and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Okay., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. workforce of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise house owners and oldsters who’re combating to guard freedom and liberty.